View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Bottleneck Analysis |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-3 h | 20-60 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-12 | 1 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | FlowMeasurementConstraints | KnowledgeMappingRisk | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |