View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Bottleneck Analysis |  Engineering Kanban |  Decision Making Three-Point Estimation |  Agile Story Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes. | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | Ongoing | 10-30 min je Item | laufend, 1-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-12 | 1-8 | 3-9 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption Notes | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data |
Tagsno overlap | FlowMeasurementConstraints | FlowVisual managementDelivery | EstimationUncertaintyForecasting | EstimationAgileMeasurement |