methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Bottleneck Analysis.
Operations
Bottleneck Analysis
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
A paper-based illustration representing Context Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Context Canvas
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 Wochen45-90 min120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-84-12 Beobachtungen3-103-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up MeasuresField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsContext canvas, Open questions, Shared context notesHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
FlowMeasurementConstraints
UX researchObservationContext
ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods