View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Bottleneck Analysis | ![]() UX Research Contextual Inquiry | ![]() Product Discovery Context Canvas | ![]() UX Research HEART Framework |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-3 Wochen | 45-90 min | 120 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-10 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard |
Tagsno overlap | FlowMeasurementConstraints | UX researchObservationContext | ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction |



