View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Bottleneck Analysis |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Operations Eat the Frog |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-3 h | 15-90 min daily | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 5-30 | 1 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | FlowMeasurementConstraints | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |