View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Bottleneck AnalysisArchitecture Decision RecordConsensus WorkshopStakeholder Salience Model
| Criterion |  Operations Bottleneck Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 15-45 min | 1-3 h | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-3 | 5-30 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | FlowMeasurementConstraints | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |