View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Facilitation Troika Consulting |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 45-90 min | 30-45 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 15-200 | 8-80 | 3-30 | 20-500+ |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | FacilitationCoachingLearning | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |