methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Purposedifferent
Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-6 h1-2 h1-6 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-83-102-84-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning PlanFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Add more methods