View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-60 min | 45-75 min | 5-20 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-20 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | EstimationEffortRisk | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |