View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-60 min | 45-90 min | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | KPI Tree, Owner List | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | ChangeDecisionStrategy | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |