View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Operations PDCA Cycle | ![]() Operations Fishbone Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode. | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-60 min | 2-6 h | 1 h bis mehrere Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 1-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | Continuous improvementLeanExperiments | Root causeQualityOperations |



