Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Strategy Map Current Reality Tree Causal Loop Diagram

Criterion	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Business Strategy Strategy Map	Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree	Systems Thinking Causal Loop Diagram
Purposedifferent	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	A Strategy Map translates strategy into a few connected objectives across perspectives such as finance, customers, processes, and learning. This makes visible which capabilities and activities are meant to drive which results.	A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.	A Causal Loop Diagram makes feedback, reinforcement, and balance in a system legible. It uncovers side effects and self-reinforcement that stay hidden in linear explanations.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	High	Medium
Timedifferent	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	2-4 h workshop plus review	2-6 h	1-3 h
Participantsdifferent	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	4-10	3-8	2-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	Strategy Map, Objective Set, Cause-Effect Hypotheses	Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas	Causal Loop Diagram, Feedback Notes, Leverage Points
Tagsno overlap	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	AlignmentExecutionGoalsCausality	Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality	FeedbackSystems thinkingCausalityDynamics

Add more methods