Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Root Cause Analysis Causal Loop Diagram Current Reality Tree

Criterion	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Operations Root Cause Analysis	Systems Thinking Causal Loop Diagram	Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.	A Causal Loop Diagram makes feedback, reinforcement, and balance in a system legible. It uncovers side effects and self-reinforcement that stay hidden in linear explanations.	A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Medium	High
Timedifferent	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	1-4 h	1-3 h	2-6 h
Participantsdifferent	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	3-8	2-8	3-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	Problem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan	Causal Loop Diagram, Feedback Notes, Leverage Points	Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident	FeedbackSystems thinkingCausalityDynamics	Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality

Add more methods