Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Intervention Mapping Causal Loop Diagram Current Reality Tree

Criterion	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping	Systems Thinking Causal Loop Diagram	Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.	A Causal Loop Diagram makes feedback, reinforcement, and balance in a system legible. It uncovers side effects and self-reinforcement that stay hidden in linear explanations.	A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	High	Medium	High
Timedifferent	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	1-5 Tage	1-3 h	2-6 h
Participantsdifferent	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	4-12	2-8	3-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan	Causal Loop Diagram, Feedback Notes, Leverage Points	Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	ChangeSystems thinkingCapability	FeedbackSystems thinkingCausalityDynamics	Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality

Add more methods