View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Design ThinkingWizard of Oz TestOutcome-Driven Innovation
| Criterion |  Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs) |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Product Discovery Wizard of Oz Test |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | High | High |
Timedifferent | 2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 2-10 Tage | Mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | Designers, developers as users, and facilitation | 4-10 | 5-20 Nutzer | 2-6 researchers plus sample |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Prototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk List | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks | InnovationPrototypeResearch | PrototypeValidationMVP | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative |