View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Decision Making Wideband Delphi |  Decision Making Red Teaming |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes. | For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-4 h or multiple rounds | 1-4 h | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 4-12 Experten | 3-8 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Estimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus Notes | Challenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation Plan | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | SensemakingDecisionRationale | EstimationExpertsForecasting | RiskDecisionSensemaking | EstimationEffortRisk |