View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  UX Research Card Sorting |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  UX Research Tree Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 20-45 min | 1-3 h | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | Based on research question | 2-8 | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA |
Tagsno overlap | SensemakingDecisionRationale | Information architectureNavigationStructure | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | Information architectureNavigationFindability |