View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 45-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-20 Reviewer | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |