methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of KPI Tree with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
KPI Tree
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-5 Tage90-180 min initial, dann laufend1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
1-4Nutzertraffic3-81-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteKPI Tree, Owner ListExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods