View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Ansoff MatrixSmoke TestArchitecture Decision RecordARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix |  Product Discovery Smoke Test |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-5 Tage | 15-45 min | 2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic | 1-3 | Designers, developers as users, and facilitation |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions |
Tagsno overlap | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks |