methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration of Three Horizons with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
Three Horizons
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 minWochen bis Monate je GoalHalbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-83-103-121-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsHorizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource planExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods