methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of Three Horizons with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
Three Horizons
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 hHalbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-81-53-121-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesHorizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource planExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods