methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Paper illustration for Standard Work Analysis.
Operations
Standard Work Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily30-60 min1-3 h15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
12-82-62-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogStandard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training NeedsRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeQualityOperations
LeanProcessQuality
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods