View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Operations RACI Matrix |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |