View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Growth Hooked Model |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Growth North Star Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Multiple workshops over several weeks | 60-90 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Hooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics check | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | North Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | GrowthBehaviorRetention | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention |