View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations After-Action Review |  Delivery RAID Log |  Operations Fishbone Diagram |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 30-60 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions |
Tagsno overlap | LearningOperationsImprovement | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | Root causeQualityOperations | RiskRoot causeSafety |