View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations After-Action Review |  Operations RACI Matrix |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 45-90 min | 45–75 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-8 | Team members involved | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | LearningOperationsImprovement | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |