methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Affinity Estimation.
Agile
Affinity Estimation
Paper illustration for Story Points.
Agile
Story Points
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes.When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-90 minlaufend, 1-5 min je Item120 min initial, dann laufend30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-123-93-62-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear ItemsPoint Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity DataHEART-GSM Table, DashboardCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
EstimationBacklogRelative sizing
EstimationAgileMeasurement
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods