View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Affinity Diagramming |  Decision Making DACI |  Agile ROAM Board |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–90 min | 30-60 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-10 | 3-15 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Theme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areas | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | ROAM Board, Owner List | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |