View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Affinity Diagramming | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All |
|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–90 min | 10-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-100+ |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Theme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areas | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause | FacilitationInclusionIdeation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.





