methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min30-60 min je Interview1-2 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-35-10 Interviews3-103-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
Add more methods