methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Affinity Diagramming
UX Research
Affinity Diagramming
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-4 h45–90 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
1-33-83-102-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanTheme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areasCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods