methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-3 h30 min Setup, dann laufend1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-32-81-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone4-12
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleFive Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic OptionsRAID Log, Status Report SourceAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
StrategyCompetitionMarket
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods