methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-3 h45-90 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
1-32-102-82-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationalePESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
StrategyMarketAnalysis
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Add more methods