methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration for Fault Isolation.
Engineering
Fault Isolation
Paper illustration for Golden Path
Engineering
Golden Path
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.In technical failures, the visible symptom often gets mixed up with the actual cause. Fault Isolation narrows the fault space and progressively reduces which part of the system is truly affected.When teams need a reliable default path for frequent use, sprawl quickly emerges without any guiding logic. Golden Path bundles the preferred path so good practice becomes easy and deviation becomes deliberate.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min30-120 min30-180 min1-3 Tage Setup, laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-32-61-62-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasFault Isolation Map, Test Log, Excluded Hypotheses, Narrowed Fault AreaGolden Path Guide, Templates, Quality Checks
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
LeanObservationProcessOperations
TroubleshootingDiagnosisEngineering
EngineeringProductivityGovernance
Add more methods