methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min10-20 min daily1-3 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-315-303-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
Add more methods