methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Eat the Frog
Operations
Eat the Frog
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-6 Wochen15-90 min daily1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
1-34-1013-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanPriority Task, Completion Note, Daily FocusProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods