methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
15-45 min15-30 min1-3 h1-6 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
1-32-62-84-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Add more methods