View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Facilitation Question Burst |  Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 10-20 min | 15-30 min | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 4-100+ | 2-8 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Question List, Reframed Challenge, Learning Prompts | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity |