View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Accountability Ladder |  Agile WSJF |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-10 | 3-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |