methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of System Dynamics Simulation with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
System Dynamics Simulation
Stock and Flow Diagram method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Stock and Flow Diagram
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports.A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighHigh
Timedifferent
20-45 min45-90 minMehrere Tage bis Wochen2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
1-83-101-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron1-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsSimulation Model, Scenario ReportsStock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation Hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis
DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking
Add more methods