methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min45-90 min1-6 Wochen45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-83-104-103-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
AutonomyRolesTeam
Add more methods