methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighHigh
Timedifferent
30-60 min5-20 min2-6 h2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
1-53-203-83-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
EstimationEffortRisk
RiskRoot causeSafety
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods