View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations ABC Analysis | ![]() Operations Bottleneck Analysis | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Operations Theory of Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | For a system that does not get faster despite effort, the method directs attention to the bottleneck. It concentrates improvement on the point that actually limits throughput. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 h | 2-6 h | 2-4 h Analyse, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 3-8 | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Constraint Map, Improvement Plan, Flow Metrics |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | FlowMeasurementConstraints | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | OperationsConstraintsFlowImprovement |



