View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth A/B Testing |  Innovation SCAMPER |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Innovation Lotus Blossom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min | 45-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 2-10 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Lotus Diagram, Idea Themes, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop |