methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-8 h1-2 h15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
2-52-83-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk PlanArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods