methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min120 min initial, dann laufend2-8 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-53-62-82-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisHEART-GSM Table, DashboardProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk PlanCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods