View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations 8D Problem Solving |  Engineering Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting |  Architecture arc42 |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. | When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-6 Wochen | 30-240 min | 1-2 Tage | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan | Hypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis Summary | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause | TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |