View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations 8D Problem Solving | ![]() Innovation Design Sprint | ![]() Innovation Crazy 8s | ![]() Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-6 Wochen | 4-5 Tage | 8-15 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 5-8 | 1-10 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |



