methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-6 Wochen15-45 min1-4 h1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
4-101-31-53-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanADR File, Decision Log, RationaleContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods