methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration of the Morphological Analysis working structure.
Innovation
Morphological Analysis
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration for TRIZ
Innovation
TRIZ
Purposedifferent
For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.For a search for solutions with many degrees of freedom, a grid emerges for systematic combinations. The method separates features, variants, and exclusion criteria, so the space gets explored deliberately.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
15-30 min1-3 h1-4 h1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-62-83-82-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Root cause notes, CountermeasuresMorphological Box, Concept Combinations, Idea ShortlistProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanContradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts
Tagsno overlap
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
IdeationInnovationCreativity
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity
Add more methods